Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ross Boulton's avatar

The fog of war—both sides spinning, neither trustworthy—is one of the oldest excuses for sitting out, and one of the most exploited.

The true part: first reports are wrong, atrocities get invented or inflated, propaganda flows every direction. Skepticism is warranted. Certainty about fast-moving events is usually a mistake.

The smuggled part: “can’t trust either side” slides into “all claims are equal,” which slides into “I don’t have to evaluate anything.” That move always benefits whoever’s doing the worse thing. Symmetry of distrust is not symmetry of facts. Some claims are checkable—imagery, documents, money, metadata, the record of who lied last time. The fog isn’t uniform. Parts of it clear if you do the work.

So the stance isn’t “trust no one.” It’s “trust differently”: weight sources by their record, look for evidence that’s hard to fake, notice who profits from your shrug, and hold conclusions provisionally instead of dropping them.

No posts

Ready for more?